Overview

This research programme spans fourteen academic disciplines and produces twenty papers documenting institutional accommodation failure across multiple institutions. The methodology, dataset, and computational architecture are novel in the literature.

Full paper texts will be available following the resolution of active legal proceedings. Titles, target journals, and methodological summaries are provided below.


Novel Methodology

Double-Blind Autoethnography

The researcher did not know they were researching. The institution did not know it was being studied. Both records were produced independently. Freedom of information returns force convergence. No observer effect on either side.

This methodology has no existing precedent in the qualitative literature. It emerged from circumstance – institutional records and parallel creative output, produced without research intent, later recognised as datasets documenting the same phenomena from opposite sides.

Iron Gate Doctrine

An ethical framework for AI-assisted academic and professional practice. The forensic provenance chain proves human authorship through timestamped, hashed documentation of every human input, machine processing step, and output. The tool enables the production of the researcher’s directing – it does not replace the direction itself.

The saws did the cutting. But the carpenter built the house.

Forensic Correlation Methodology

A computational provenance architecture linking human direction to machine-assisted output with cryptographic verification. Open-source implementation: forensic_correlation_log.py.


Disciplines


UK Research Relevance

The institute’s research has direct application to UK legal and policy frameworks:


Papers

#TitleTarget JournalStatus
1The Unconscious ArchiveJournal of AutoethnographyDraft complete
2Net vs. Swamp: Three Veterans, Three OutcomesJournal of Veterans StudiesDraft complete
3The Banner/Hulk Coexistence ModelDisability Studies QuarterlyInternal ceiling reached
4The Capability ParadoxStudies in Social JusticeInternal ceiling reached
5Double-Blind AutoethnographyQualitative InquiryNear ceiling
6The Gates: AI-as-AccommodationCanadian Journal of Disability StudiesNear ceiling
7The Iron Gate: Provenance, Authorship, and AI EthicsAI & EthicsConceptual
8Before the Bench, Behind the CredentialCanadian Journal of Law & SocietyConceptual
9The Sheepdog ModelHousing StudiesFirst draft
10The Contemporary DocumentQualitative InquiryFirst draft
11[Title withheld – pending proceedings]Canadian Lawyer MagazineFirst draft
12The Collective Unconscious ArchiveJournal of Popular Music StudiesConceptual
13Capitalism 101 in the Name of CommunismHarvard Negotiation Law ReviewConceptual
14The Murphy Model: Socialist Capital Reinvestment in HousingHousing Studies / J. Urban AffairsConceptual

Total corpus: Twenty papers across fourteen disciplines.


Postgraduate Thesis

“Keys to the Cuffs”

Full title: The Capability Paradox: Institutional Misrecognition, Unconscious Documentation, and the Architecture of Accommodation Failure in Veteran Transition

Mixed-methods: qualitative narrative + quantitative provenance data + computational tool architecture. Ten-institution pattern. Fourteen academic disciplines. Forensic-grade, multi-layer institutional analysis novel in scope.


Contact

MachenTagar | England & Wales | uk@machentagar.ca